"Free" Artificial Reefs: Poor Tools for Restoring Coral Reefs

What about conventional artificial reefs?

What do they actually accomplish in terms of coral reef rehabilitation?

It is not uncommon for artificial reefs to be made from free "materials of opportunity" such as donated ships, cars, tires, or demolition concrete. Although often installed in temperate waters to improve sportfishing and recreational diving, these artificial reefs are not appropriate for the rehabilitation of damaged coral reefs for a variety of reasons:

  • Sinking of ships, cars, scrap metal, concrete or other materials of opportunity on coral reefs does little to restore living coral cover.

  • Materials like construction-grade concrete and scrap metal are chemically reactive in seawater and interfere with coral settlement and growth.

  • Shapes with large void spaces primarily function to aggregate adult fish, which can allow important brood stocks to be easily fished out.

  • Because conventional artificial reefs don't provide complex, fine-scale habitat for juvenile fish and herbivorous fish, they do little to restock depleted reef fisheries and often become covered with fast-growing algae that can smother and kill young corals.

  • Expensive and cumbersome to install, conventional artificial reefs usually end up as small-scale, token deployments that fail to have any significant impact on fish and coral reproduction rates.

  • Conventional artificial reefs often result in bizarre underwater eyesores of astonishing durability -- a poor choice for dive resorts and marine sanctuaries with excellent water visibility.

To many ecologists and conservationists, conventional artificial reefs represent a form of marine pollution with no ecological benefit.

To many divemasters and hotel owners, conventional artificial reefs are unattractive and a poor ecotourism investment.

Tires.

Ships.

Concrete Blocks.

Cars.


EcoReefs Compared to "Free" Artificial Reefs

EcoReefs beats artificial reefs made from free materials of opportunity in comparisons of potential ecological benefits, impact on tourism, and ease and cost of deployment.

Feature

EcoReefs

"Free" Artificial Reefs

Is it compatible with ecotourism?

YES: Looks natural underwater

NO: Unsightly underwater

Does it rehabilitate the reef ecosystem?

YES: Can be replaced by living coral

NO: Permanent structure

Does it help build coastal fisheries?

YES: Provides habitat for juvenile fish

NO: Provides habitat for larger adult fish

Does it minimize algae growth?

YES: Provides habitat for small herbivores

NO: Fails to provide for small herbivores

Does it promote coral growth?

YES: pH neutral ceramic and shaded plates are ideal for coral settlement

NO: Construction concrete (basic pH) or scrap metal (reactive) surfaces retard coral settlement

Does it accept coral transplants?

YES: Coral branch tips can be attached directly to the module ceramic

NO: Additional surface preparation and mounting hardware required

Is it ecologically significant?

YES: Covers large areas

NO: Localized effects only

Is it fast & easy to install?

YES: Prefabricated kits

NO: Heavy lifting equipment and barges required

Is it cost effective?

YES: Improves reef environments at a low cost per area covered

NO: Degrades reef environments, high potential for unforeseen and costly negative impacts

Last modified: April 11th, 2004 07:09:27 PM EDT.